Wave particle duality , quantum mechanics , Unquantum Effect , physics paradox , gamma rays , alpha rays , photons , zero-point energy , Max Planck , loading theory , Eric Reiter : key words.
Welcome to Unquantum.net
Latest News: The Unquantum Effect book will someday be self published with my latest invention, the SlantBind method. SlantBind patent application is viewable. You need to download a free TIFF viewer to see the drawings.
CD of new book by Eric Stanley Reiter is now ready to purchase at ebay. Lecture slides are viewable in Open Office Impress.
The Unquantum Effect
Resolving the Wave-Particle Paradox
Table of Contents
Cover the chamber of quantum doom Inside Front Cover the condensed idea Title Page
Overview and Acknowledgments
Experiment Reveals An Understandable World (2003)
List of Textbook Misconceptions
An Understanding of the Particle-like Property of Light and Charge (2001)
Part II color
A Serious Challenge to Quantization How photon violation was discovered; repeats some theory from Part I (2003).
Flawed beam-splitter tests of the past Selected article clippings of pivotal influence in physics.
Part III black
Photon Violation Spectroscopy Invention writing, five physics discoveries, and restated material from Parts I and II (2005).
Unquantum Measurement of Annihilation Radiation of cover photo (2007).
Part IV color
Photo Essay for Photon Violation Spectroscopy
Proposed Unquantum spectrometer products
Part V color
Particle Violation Spectroscopy Invention writing, new work on splitting the alpha, and the discovery of proto-helium (2007).
Planck's A New Radiation Hypothesis, 1911, translated.
Industrial Application Note
Part VI color
Photo Essay for Particle Violation Spectroscopy
Photo Essay, Other Creations, inventions from the author's past.
email: eric@unquantum.net
There is a famous test of the photon. Amazingly, I am the only one to perform it with gamma rays. My version of Einstein's test of the photon shows that a single emitted “light quanta” can cause coincident detection events past a beam splitter (beyond chance). This defies the core of quantum mechanics and kills many research programs, especially quantum cryptography. My positive result means that their data with visible light is just noise. The fact that I use gamma rays instead of visible light is even stronger evidence. Most conventional physicists, will predict that a light quanta and especially a gamma-ray must not split in a beam splitter test. My message voids millions of dollars in research, an industry of publishers of quantum weirdness, and the work of whole societies of physicists.
The book is available now only on CD, but for a very low handling fee. Price subject to change. Most of the important physics work is free to read from this site. A paper version of the book will soon be produced in a very unique SlantBind format. The Unquantum Effect book addresses a long list of artifact and alternative interpretation issues. Purchasers of the CD are invited to call for questions/objections/feedback. My experiments are the only serious challenge to Quantum Mechanics. The work dates from year 2001, so we at the Unquantum Laboratory have experienced many opportunities with knowledgeable people to find flaws.
I have an ax to grind:
Note that http://www.unquantum.com was stolen from us by Phil Shapiro at http://www.webcountry.com !
As to the patents... Physics journals were unresponsive, so I needed a way to date and publish my work. By developing my measurements to the point of being useful in material science, the unquantum effect became a patentable invention; my lawyers agreed. Amazingly, the USPTO took the position that since the work was not published in a mainstream journal, my data just did not exist at all. But the data does exist and I did it all correctly. Someday the USPTO will look very very bad for doing what they did to me. Meanwhile, it does not matter because the writing is on the USPTO website for all to see. It is good writing, but don't bother reading the claims. Also, you need to download a TIFF viewer for the drawings. The invention writing is better formatted and easier to read in my CD book, but it is free to view from the links above.
As to journals like Nature, Physical Review, World Scientific, Foundations of Physics and the ARXIV.org website, these publishers are invested in photons and will not publish otherwise. I tested them. These problems with publishers and the patent office are only part of the reason my discovery has not been popularized. Meanwhile, I have easy to demonstrate/understand experiments and they don't. Ha ha ha ha ha ha.....
Thanks for reading. Eric Reiter.